Constitutional Amendment Propositions:
Prohibition on Using Public Funds to Advocate
This November, voters will again have the final say on infrastructure funding in Texas. Last year, Proposition 6 was approved to provide a funding source for the state’s future water needs. This year, S.J.R. 1 will be on the ballot. S.J.R. 1 proposes to use funds from the state’s “Rainy Day Fund” to pay for future transportation needs.
While city officials may believe that this, or any, constitutional amendment is important, state law prohibits a city from spending public funds to support or oppose any election measure, including a statewide constitutional amendment election.
Section 255.003 of the Election Code expressly provides that “an officer or employee of a political subdivision may not spend or authorize the spending of public funds for political advertising.” Political advertising is defined as “a communication that advocates a particular outcome in an election.” The section does not prohibit a communication that factually describes the purposes of a measure if the communication does not advocate passage or defeat of the measure.
An officer or employee who violates Section 255.003 commits a Class A misdemeanor (one year in jail, up to a $4,000 fine, or both) and may be subject to civil penalties imposed by the Texas Ethics Commission.
For detailed information on the prohibition, visit the Ethics Commission website here. Note that nothing prohibits an individual, on his or her own time and not using city resources, from advocating for a measure.